Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

The ARM Mali-G68 MP4 (or G68MC4) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP4 version uses four of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Mediatek Dimensity 900. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Mali-G Series

Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines4 - unified
Shared Memoryno
technology5 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
48592 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4505     avg: 5078     median: 5061 (22%)     max: 5612 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5193     avg: 5883     median: 6021 (13%)     max: 6313 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3514     avg: 4058     median: 4173 (18%)     max: 4362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3678     avg: 4183     median: 4213 (10%)     max: 4406 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4021     avg: 4779     median: 4796 (43%)     max: 5335 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4927     avg: 5628     median: 5747 (34%)     max: 6110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3378     avg: 3886     median: 3887 (19%)     max: 4225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3580     avg: 4104     median: 4085.5 (14%)     max: 4372 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2001     avg: 2208     median: 2237.5 (1%)     max: 2401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 567     avg: 609     median: 617 (1%)     max: 641 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.1     avg: 6.1     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 10.5     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 27.7     median: 28 (2%)     max: 30 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 25.2     median: 25 (2%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 41.9     median: 42 (1%)     max: 46 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 64.5     median: 64.5 (3%)     max: 69 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 91     avg: 100.7     median: 101.5 (1%)     max: 108 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 109691     avg: 127408     median: 128282 (13%)     max: 140863 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 104333     avg: 107286     median: 107208 (9%)     max: 109771 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 25.38     avg: 34.4     median: 33.2 (1%)     max: 39.37 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2243     avg: 2305     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2394 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2298     avg: 2329     median: 2310.5 (1%)     max: 2376 points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13104     avg: 21255     median: 21981 (8%)     max: 26121 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4174     avg: 20359     median: 22932.5 (38%)     max: 27937 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.95     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (2%)     max: 7.55 Watt
0123456789Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
29.8 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
30.5 32 37 43.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
23 27 34.6 35 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 30 40 58.7 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
28 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
71  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact3630
Armajet76
PUBG Mobile48453739.8
Dead Trigger 271
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers80
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4


1


2
3

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 15. 11:31:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:36:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.015s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.07s ... 0.12s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.488s ... 0.608s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.608s

#12 Got 65 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.622s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.622s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.625s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.045s ... 0.67s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.672s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G68 MP4 graphics card

Doogee V Max Plus review - Rugged smartphone with monster battery

Doogee V Max Plus review - Rugged smartphone with monster battery

The Doogee V Max Plus is certainly not a pocket smartphone, but aims to score points with its 22,000 mAhbattery and robust design. It also offers a triple camer...
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.58" | 539 g
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (with matte display) review – Screen revolution within the mid-range tablet class?

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (with matte display) review – Screen revolution within the mid-range tablet class?

The Lenovo Tab P12's matte display is an interesting new feature: A tablet display that is less reflective and supposedly feels like paper when used with the in...
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 12.70" | 615 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Review - An affordable tablet with an S Pen and wrinkles

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) is an affordable mid-range tablet that comes complete with a stylus pen. Find out whether the second edition of this Samsu...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 10.40" | 467 g
Test Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Smartphone

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G smartphone review - Colorful, sustainable and really good! Is there a catch?

Price-wise, the Galaxy A25 is situated in the mid-range category, and, offering 4 big Android updates as well as 5 years of security updates, it has more softwa...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.50" | 197 g
Samsung Galaxy M34

Samsung Galaxy M34 5G smartphone review – The king of endurance for US$330

After a year-long break, the Samsung Galaxy M devices have returned as an affordable mid-range series. The Galaxy M34 5G features a massive 6,000-mAh battery, a...
Samsung Exynos 1280 | ARM Mali-G68 MP4 | 6.50" | 208 g

Realme 11 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 11 Pro+ review - 200-megapixel camera in a high-quality smartphone

Realme 11 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Realme 11 Pro smartphone review – The designer phone with quick memory

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo Tab P12 review - A powerful XXL tablet with lots of accessories

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G smartphone review: 200-megapixel camera in the midrange

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A34 5G smartphone review: Affordable all-rounder with an extra-bright OLED display

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G review - Slim 5G smartphone with OIS at flagship level?

Gigaset GX6: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.60", 0.3 kg
  Review » Gigaset GX6 smartphone review - Stable, fast and with replaceable battery

Samsung Galaxy M53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy M53 5G smartphone review: Mid-range phone with orientation problems

Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy M33 5G smartphone review - Is 120 Hz enough in a mid-range phone?

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A33 5G review: Better than its predecessor in almost every area

Vivo V23 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  Review » Vivo V23 5G review - Selfie smartphone with extravagant color

Samsung Galaxy A53: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A53 5G smartphone review: Galaxy phone with bright AMOLED display

Oppo Find X5 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X5 Lite review: Mid-range smartphone in optical disguise

Realme 9 Pro Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme 9 Pro Plus Smartphone Review- Lots of performance and decent low-light photography

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Review: 90 Hz Smartphone with Three Years of Updates and an Attractive Price

Oppo Reno6 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Reno6 5G in review: High-quality mid-range smartphone

Oukitel WP300: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.80", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP300

Doogee Fire 6 Max: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.72", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doogee Fire 6 Max

Doogee S118 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee S118 Pro

Doogee S200X: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.72", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee S200X

Doogee Blade GT: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.72", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee Blade GT

Oppo Reno11 A: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11 A

Doogee V Max Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max Pro

Oppo F27 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F27 5G

Doogee S200: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.72", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee S200

Doogee V Max Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max Plus

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12 matte display

Oppo F27 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F27 Pro+

Cubot KingKong X: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong X

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024: Samsung Exynos 1280, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024

Realme Narzo 70: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 70

Realme P1 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme P1 5G

Realme Narzo 70 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 70 Pro

Oppo F25 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F25 Pro 5G

Realme 12+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 12+

Oppo Reno11 F: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11 F

Blackview BL8000: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.78", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Blackview BL8000

Umidigi A15 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A15 Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A25 5G

Ulefone Power Armor 18 Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18 Ultra

Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra

Doogee V30 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.58", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30 Pro

Oppo A2 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A2 Pro

Doogee V31 GT: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V31 GT

Samsung Galaxy F34 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy F34 5G

Samsung Galaxy M34 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M34 5G

Realme Narzo 60 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme Narzo 60 Pro

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P12

Oppo Reno10: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno10

Realme 11 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 11 Pro

Doogee V30T: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30T

Realme 11 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 11 Pro+

Doogee V Max: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee V Max

Vivo Y100: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y100

Vivo iQOO Z7: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z7

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

Doogee V30: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Doogee V30

Honor 80 SE: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 80 SE

Ulefone Power Armor 18T: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 18T

Infinix Zero 5G 2023: unknown, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero 5G 2023

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer (Discovery): unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer (Discovery)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro

Infinix Zero Ultra: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero Ultra

Vivo X80 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X80 Lite

Realme 10 Pro+: unknown, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 10 Pro+

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Gigaset GX6: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GX6

Vivo V25 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44"
  External Review » Vivo V25 5G

Realme Narzo 50 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 50 Pro

Samsung Galaxy M53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M53 5G

Xiaomi 11i: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 11i

Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.50", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro 5G

Umidigi Bison GT2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.50", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison GT2 5G

Samsung Galaxy M33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M33 5G

Honor 60 SE: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 60 SE

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Samsung Galaxy A53: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A53

Oppo Find X5 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X5 Lite

Infinix Zero 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Zero 5G

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G

Realme 9 Pro Plus: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 Pro Plus

Xiaomi Mi 11i HyperCharge: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi 11i HyperCharge

Vivo T1x: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo T1x

Oppo Reno7 SE 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7 SE 5G

Coolpad Cool 20 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Cool 20 Pro

Vivo V23 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V23 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+: unknown, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+

Vivo iQOO Z5x: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z5x

Vivo S10e: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S10e

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro (China): MediaTek Dimensity 920, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro

Honor X30 Max: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 7.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X30 Max

Honor X20: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X20

Honor Play5 Youth: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor Play5 Youth

Honor Tab V7: unknown, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Tab V7

Oppo Reno6 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 5G

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
   » Lenovo Tab P12 Android tablet with large 3K display gets enticing 29% price cut

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024: Samsung Exynos 1280, 10.40", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Tab S6 Lite with S Pen support gets biggest price cut ever on Amazon

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
   » Lenovo Tab P12 is 25% off in one of the best budget tablet deals under $300

   » Lenovo Tab P12 tablet with 3K display currently discounted by 27%

Realme 11 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » realme 11 Pro: Italian chic with great features

Lenovo Tab P12: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, 12.70", 0.6 kg
   » Lenovo Tab P12: An inexpensive 12-inch tablet and productive system in one

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ - What can the 200-megapixel camera do?

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.60", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: High-quality smartphone with upper-class looks for little money

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G test verdict: Time for a strategy change in the smartphone segment

   » New global Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 series details leak

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 1080, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » New global Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 series details leak

Samsung Galaxy M53 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy M53: A lightweight phone with one big flaw

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.40", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Reboot with AMOLED display

Samsung Galaxy A53: Samsung Exynos 1280, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A53: Once again, the Exynos SoC fails to impress

Oppo Find X5 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X5 Lite review verdict: The low-priced Oppo smartphone has an identity problem

OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 900, 6.43", 0.2 kg
   » OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G smartphone review conclusion: Can less sometimes be more?

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-09-26)